Heavy Metal Pollution Risk Assessment and Source Analysis in Warri River Sediments

Authors

  • Isreal Oluwatimileyin Akinwole Department of Chemistry, Aix-Marseille University, France; Jacio Environmental Limited, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-0915
  • Ayodele Christianah Adeboye Department of Geology and Mineral Science, University of Ilorin, Nigeria
  • Isa Elabor School of the Environment, Florida Agriculture and Mechanical University, USA; Jacio Environmental Limited, Nigeria
  • Gibson Alaiya Jacio Environmental Limited, Nigeria
  • Abdulganiyu A. Akangbe Department of Chemical Engineering, University of the West of Scotland, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.80.4.35739

Keywords:

Warri River, Heavy metal contamination, Sediment quality, Pollution indices, Anthropogenic processes, Industrial activities

Abstract

Contaminated river sediment poses a threat to aquatic life and public health. The focus of this study was to investigate possible contamination of sediments from the Warri River. Triplicate samples were collected from ten sites of intense industrial activities. The sediments were analysed for heavy metals (HMs), anions, and physicochemical properties, including total hydrocarbon content (THC), an indicator of hydrocarbon contamination. The contamination level was evaluated using the following indices: contamination factor index (CF), geo-accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), ecological risk index (ERI), modified degree of contamination (mCd), pollution load index (PLI), risk index (RI) and sediment quality guidelines (SQG). Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) were used to identify the sources of HM contamination. The aggregate contamination indices (mCd, PLI and RI) indicate no contamination/pollution or ecological risk. Similarly, the single contamination indices (CF, Igeo, and ERI) showed low contamination and ecological risk for almost all heavy metals except for Cd, which was high in many sample locations. Most of the heavy metals exhibited values below both the threshold-effects level (TEL) and the probable-effects level (PEL), except for Cd, where 80% of locations recorded levels between TEL and PEL, suggesting possible ecological risk for Cd. PCA suggests that PC1, loaded with Fe, Zn, Ni, Cd and Cr, indicates anthropogenic activity. PC2, loaded with Mn and Pb, suggests both anthropogenic and geogenic origins. In conclusion, the possible HM contamination necessitates urgent government intervention to protect aquatic ecosystems and public health.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

Issue

Section

Articles